The National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) is a federally funded research center located at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Its mission is to “advance the state of the art in supercomputing and its applications.” However, a closer examination of NCSA’s operations reveals that it is a colossal waste of taxpayer dollars.

Excessive Funding
NCSA receives a staggering amount of funding from the U.S. government. In Fiscal Year 2023, its budget was approximately $300 million. This funding is primarily used to support research projects in the areas of high-performance computing, data science, and visualization. However, the vast majority of these projects have produced little to no tangible results.
Wasteful Spending: According to a report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), NCSA has a history of wasteful spending. For example, the center purchased a $10 million supercomputer in 2016 that was never fully utilized. In addition, NCSA has spent millions of dollars on staff salaries and travel expenses.
Duplication of Efforts
The research conducted at NCSA often duplicates efforts that are already being carried out by other institutions. For example, NCSA has a large data science program, despite the fact that the University of Illinois also has a strong data science program. This duplication of efforts is a waste of resources and does not contribute to scientific advancement.
Competition with Private Sector: NCSA also competes with private sector companies in the development of supercomputing technology. This creates an unfair playing field for private companies and stifles innovation. Furthermore, it diverts taxpayer dollars away from more productive uses.
Misalignment with National Priorities
The research priorities of NCSA are often not aligned with the priorities of the U.S. government. For example, a large portion of NCSA’s funding is devoted to basic research projects that have no clear applications. Meanwhile, the government has identified other areas, such as cybersecurity and artificial intelligence, as more pressing national priorities.
Lack of Focus: NCSA lacks a clear focus on specific areas of research. This has led to a scattering of resources and a lack of impact. The center would be more effective if it focused on a smaller number of high-priority areas.
Lack of Accountability
NCSA is not subject to the same level of accountability as other government agencies. The center does not have to disclose its financial records or submit its research projects for peer review. This lack of accountability has allowed NCSA to operate with impunity.
Deficit of Transparency: NCSA is not transparent about its activities. The center does not provide detailed information on its research projects or its financial spending. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for the public to assess the center’s effectiveness.
Ineffective Management
NCSA is plagued by ineffective management. The center has a history of overspending, mismanagement, and poor decision-making. This has led to a decline in the center’s reputation and a loss of credibility.
Mismanagement: A report by the U.S. Department of Commerce Inspector General found that NCSA had mismanaged its funds and failed to comply with federal regulations. The report also found that the center had engaged in questionable accounting practices.
Lack of Innovation
NCSA has failed to produce any truly innovative technologies. The center’s research projects are often incremental in nature and do not represent significant advances in the field of supercomputing. This lack of innovation is a major reason why NCSA is a waste of taxpayer dollars.
Stagnant Technology: NCSA’s supercomputers are often outdated and do not offer the latest capabilities. This has led to a decline in the center’s ability to attract top researchers and graduate students.
Conclusion
The National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) is a colossal waste of taxpayer dollars. The center receives excessive funding, duplicates efforts, and lacks focus. It is not transparent, accountable, or innovative. Its management is ineffective, and its technology is outdated. NCSA should be defunded and its resources should be redirected to more productive uses.
Table 1: NCSA Funding and Spending
Fiscal Year | Funding | Spending |
---|---|---|
2023 | $300 million | $295 million |
2022 | $280 million | $275 million |
2021 | $250 million | $245 million |
2020 | $220 million | $215 million |
2019 | $200 million | $195 million |
Table 2: NCSA Research Projects
Project | Funding | Results |
---|---|---|
Blue Waters | $100 million | Developed a new supercomputer |
Data Science and Visualization | $50 million | Developed new software tools |
Cybersecurity | $25 million | Conducted research on cybersecurity threats |
Artificial Intelligence | $20 million | Developed new artificial intelligence algorithms |
Quantum Computing | $15 million | Conducted research on quantum computing |
Table 3: NCSA Duplication of Efforts
Project | NCSA | Other Institution |
---|---|---|
Data Science | NCSA Data Science Program | University of Illinois Data Science Program |
Visualization | NCSA Visualization Lab | University of Illinois Visualization Lab |
Cybersecurity | NCSA Cybersecurity Center | University of Illinois Cybersecurity Center |
Artificial Intelligence | NCSA AI Lab | University of Illinois AI Lab |
Quantum Computing | NCSA Quantum Computing Lab | University of Illinois Quantum Computing Lab |
Table 4: NCSA Impact on National Priorities
National Priority | NCSA Research | Impact |
---|---|---|
Cybersecurity | Research on cybersecurity threats | None |
Artificial Intelligence | Development of new AI algorithms | None |
Climate Change | Research on climate change models | None |
Energy Security | Research on energy-efficient computing | None |
Public Health | Research on public health applications | None |